From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 04 15:48:47 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DIaN5-0002h0-Ig
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:48:39 -0700
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DIaN5-0002gt-GM
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:48:39 -0700
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:48:39 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: SE with conjunctions
Message-ID: <20050404224839.GG2746@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <200503181907.12189.phma@phma.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200503181907.12189.phma@phma.hn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 9764
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 07:07:11PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> SE is grammatical with both logical and non-logical conjunctions,
> but the only usage mentioned in the refgram is {se} with logical
> conjunctions, of which the only ones it makes a difference with
> are {u/ju/gi'u/gu'u/gu}. What does {te ju} mean? Does {se} make a
> difference with any JOI (I think it should with {ce'o}, {fa'u},
> and, if I understand it right, {pi'u})?

There should be, but is not, a set subtraction JOI; that would also
apply.

{se fa'u} is Really Cool.  Thanks for bringing that up.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/