From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 07 09:38:19 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DJa1C-0002Fy-P0
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:38:11 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DJa12-0002FI-Kh
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:38:10 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so668303wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=i3luSL5HEgG7Vd/6Z2+Ss32sa6aDVqXNmN2sY+GqmFkaP17exvh0uKqWHcK60Q50v5hheqibvM2BU/3z1uySmLs+rTpM6BcZ8MdVcehiMVJKwRHo2toj3PXTHGNTyeEHOUggfdCxfhQcSUcwD6ISWvpcWxvRqAKgqFIVVIfIHfA=
Received: by 10.54.13.34 with SMTP id 34mr978056wrm;
        Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.69.3 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605040709376d3d0766@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:37:28 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Hintikka on Quantifier Scope
In-Reply-To: <20050407001954.80327.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <20050407001954.80327.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9779
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Apr 6, 2005 9:19 PM, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> http://www.hf.uio.no/filosofi/njpl/vol1no2/revolution/revolution.pdf
> 
> Oh, that Jaako!  What a card!  He is technically
> right, of course, 

I can't figure out how: 

(1)    AxEyAz(Eu/Ax) S(x,y,z,u)

differs from:

(2)   EuAxEyAz S(x,y,z,u)

They seem equivalent to me. Any hints?

mu'o mi'e xorxes