From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 14 05:22:11 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DM3Lr-0007ro-Qh for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:21:44 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DM3Lm-0007rW-Dk for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:21:43 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so450143wri for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KK2NzzRyL3fVdbIQcfB6sAYUycvdsVRdzEf1LaMzIYwzZ+zVCm/XQQTf7x4KCd77DkZCZGezDd36FDwAXksb8/89HqcJfT98PtqKzUDm22wpyO5NK5F1wwKdpRCOkubwFJTpbonhBV694oZnLvcXQb6IRZDHQJjy1BslH3zakfk= Received: by 10.54.99.3 with SMTP id w3mr605956wrb; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.69.3 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d175605041405205ccf1045@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:20:58 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: website links In-Reply-To: <200504140748.52587.phma@phma.hn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <3e9b08f83fb4ebdd98d08e3184c73024@xahlee.org> <200504140748.52587.phma@phma.hn.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9825 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 4/14/05, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 14 April 2005 02:29, xah lee wrote: > > in lojban, is it proper to call weblinks linsi? > > I think {velyla'a} is better. Since {lasna} is {jorne} plus an agent place (i.e. {jongau}), and an agent doesn't really play much of a role in weblinks, then perhaps {terjo'e} is better. >If page A links to B, which links to C, and so > on, that is a linsi. Of what material? mu'o mi'e xorxes