From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Apr 26 05:26:08 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DQP8O-0007yt-1N for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 05:25:48 -0700 Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DQP8I-0007yC-C5 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 05:25:47 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 48ABD6114; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:11:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: {xu} - question. Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:11:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050426110430.84090.qmail@web32115.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050426110430.84090.qmail@web32115.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504260811.40601.phma@phma.hn.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 9875 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tuesday 26 April 2005 07:04, Opi Lauma wrote: > coi > > Is it right that {mi vecnu ti xu ta}, implies that {mi > vecnu zo'e ta} is thru and I just want to know what is > {zo'e}, or more precisely I even have a supposition > about {zo'e}, I think that (it is/may be) {ti}? Yes. Another example: {le xruki le ginxre xrixruba xu xrula cu xrani} "Was it the hybrid buckwheat whose flowers the turkey harmed?" phma -- A man found gold and left a rope; but he who found No gold he left did tie the rope around.