From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 28 17:59:34 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRJql-0004ur-SU
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:59:23 -0700
Received: from web81309.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.84])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRJqi-0004uL-8P
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:59:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20050429005847.57647.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.69.48.37] by web81309.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:58:47 PDT
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: It is easier for a kumte...
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 9897
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--- Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/28/05, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > It is easier for a kumte to pass through the
> kanla of a jesni than
> > for me to understand some of the gismu list
> stuff.
> > 
> > *grin*
> > 
> > "kanla" includes "kumte" in its c.f. list:
> > 
> > (cf. jvinu, kerlo, viska, kumte)
> > 
> > What is up with that?
> 
> Whatever it is, it works both  ways, because
> "kumte"
> includes "kanla" in its cf. list as well:
> 
> (cf. sunla, kanla, xirma, xasli)
> 
A remote possibility: the old word for "camel"
was {kamla} and confusion ensued.