From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 29 05:19:55 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DRUQr-0000Kk-1e for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:17:27 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67] ident=[TtLTfb8qqWA6/edLri+mZNrRzzXnQMqr]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DRUOC-0000JJ-G7 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:16:10 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C489478A for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:14:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: It is easier for a kumte... In-Reply-To: <20050429005847.57647.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20050429005847.57647.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com> X-No-Archive: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 9899 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, John E Clifford wrote: > > --- Jorge Llambías wrote: >> On 4/28/05, Robin Lee Powell >> wrote: >>> >>> "kanla" includes "kumte" in its c.f. list: >>> >>> (cf. jvinu, kerlo, viska, kumte) >>> >>> What is up with that? >> >> Whatever it is, it works both ways, because >> "kumte" >> includes "kanla" in its cf. list as well: >> >> (cf. sunla, kanla, xirma, xasli) >> > A remote possibility: the old word for "camel" > was {kamla} and confusion ensued. That's what I thought, too, but it turns out not to be the case. Loglan "kamla" = Lojban "klama"; and Loglan "kanla" = Lojban "naxle". -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ The names of a species, empire, language, homeworld, homestar and so on will all be self-evidently related; Ogrons come from Ogros, Arisians come from Arisia, Arcturans come from Arcturus, and Humans no doubt come from Humus. --Justin B. Rye in A Primer In SF Xenolinguistics