From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 29 05:21:20 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DRUUS-0000N0-NJ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:21:04 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.206]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DRUUC-0000MI-6o for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:21:03 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so956305wri for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:20:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ougaB74zWhjPtGhI2H89i5lRQ60MnVNpjt6UH3LHHc5GZmCLpZxDRQ3YkOIqwlD2BN4evNzrzM2VjAsESj3AiEWBVPcdCwZgVlpgyXCA5wFOnpFS6WRJOeBKsWCH1vVePKH41H8hvqYSze9Jg4jAKr+tDH/JHZhE+ohRjRQE57Y= Received: by 10.54.121.11 with SMTP id t11mr1321202wrc; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:20:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:20:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050429052028403051@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:20:16 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "zo'e" for selbri. In-Reply-To: <200504282117.18116.phma@phma.hn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050428132810.46531.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com> <925d17560504280646259e8685@mail.gmail.com> <200504282117.18116.phma@phma.hn.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9900 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 4/28/05, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 28 April 2005 09:46, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > {go'i} matches {ri}, and {co'e} matches {zo'e}. I'm not > > sure I understand what you say {co'e} lacks, but then we > > don't seem to agree about {zo'e} in the first place anyway > > so that's not surprizing. > > By "in the first place" do you mean {fa} or {pamai}? The latter, but the former has all the chances of being true as well. :) mu'o mi'e xorxes