From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 27 14:10:29 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 27 May 2005 14:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dbm61-0003IU-DC
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 14:10:21 -0700
Received: from web81306.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.81])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dbm5x-0003IK-OD
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 14:10:21 -0700
Message-ID: <20050527211129.76583.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.88.37.184] by web81306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 14:11:29 PDT
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Again {lo}.
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 10065
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Typing is not my forte: I meant {lo gerku} -- and
{xagrai}, while we're at it.
Does this mean what I and Robin TR said is not
true of {lo gerku}?

--- Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:15:08AM -0700, John
> E Clifford wrote:
> > Surely, if no dog is a friend of any man,
> then
> > {le gerku cu xagai pendo lo remna} is false,
> so
> > it does indeed entail Robin Turk's claimed
> > reading.
> 
> Sure, but Robin.TR was talking about {lo
> gerku}.
> 
> -Robin
> 
> -- 
> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ ***
> http://www.lojban.org/
> Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their
> Grate!"
> Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute -
> http://singinst.org/
> 
> 
> 
>