From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 27 16:56:08 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DbogK-0005yk-4H
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:56:00 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DbogI-0005yc-CS
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:55:59 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so948325wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=DVQY4WU4NtF5gW7ngirwa9jleDCS8ff7rPrW1RlZe++spx1dYrF4TH/rq2t1prUBtmMqB8tPXF0WnxKRkRDTC0LjZ/fOtoY1POpSsZh0x9M7ik0oSo/CFny059pWOdj1Q1yV7T0Wj3PaRZSX3UwZFCjI6LjvB+5MJlShLakMOMs=
Received: by 10.54.117.4 with SMTP id p4mr1865211wrc;
        Fri, 27 May 2005 16:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d1756050527165769958d7b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:57:11 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Again {lo}.
In-Reply-To: <20050527234644.37077.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050527234644.37077.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10068
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/27/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant to say, "means at least."
> Is it really true that {lo} cannot be used in
> singular claims, only in general ones? 

Huh? Who said that?

{lo gerku cu xagrai pendo lo remna} CAN be used
to translate "the dog is man's best friend". Nodody
said it cannot be used in singular claims.

mu'o mi'e xorxes