From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun May 29 12:22:12 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 May 2005 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DcTMJ-0000EA-C0 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:22:03 -0700 Received: from web81301.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.76]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DcTMG-0000Dy-RF for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:22:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20050529192330.77374.qmail@web81301.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.88.37.184] by web81301.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:23:30 PDT Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:23:30 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: [lojban] Re: tirxu To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 10085 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Black jaguars too. It is less a different shade per se and more a matter of a different reflection (perhaps a different texture of the hairs involved): the way to see the spots is to shine a light on the critter at an oblique angle (I think there is an optimal one) to your line of vision. --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday 29 May 2005 11:46, Aleksej R. > Serdyukov wrote: > > " tirxu tiger > x1 is a > > tiger/leopard/jaguar/[tigress] of > species/breed x2 with coat markings x3 > > ai 0 [a great cat > noted/recognized by its > > markings, metaphorically: stripes, tiger > markings]; (cf. mlatu)" > > > > What about black jaguar or black leopard > which don't have markings? > > Black leopards (panthers) do have markings. > They're black on black, two > different shades. > > phma > -- > S Fa1>+/- !TM Ng--- M-- K H T-- t? AT++ SY Te- > SC- FO- D P !Tz E++ L > Am I Ha- hc-- FH+++ IP? > > > >