From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 31 06:12:32 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 31 May 2005 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dd6XQ-0003Cx-EX
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:12:10 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dd6XF-0003Cf-Tk
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:12:07 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2220368wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=IiNeb0IS3GhcuN+CwB4FWcedtBm2MRJWvo+Wnd/YwFTEduRQNPnmg1SltOby9Q7JSX5EVTdPErbem6baSsDV5CAQmCCE5yLqyJkDbmB2D4wveb9rEvI2ivpibrSfj1XRT/OF/OaGcX7j8GCqCPLeTt4LSvSf7c6HJpYvuO1SS2g=
Received: by 10.54.37.8 with SMTP id k8mr3039509wrk;
        Tue, 31 May 2005 06:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605053106135dfda72b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:44 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: le zdilisre
In-Reply-To: <429C3898.4020301@yandex.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050530174134.30796.qmail@web81307.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <429C3898.4020301@yandex.ru>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10092
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/31/05, Aleksej R. Serdyukov <deletesoftware@yandex.ru> wrote:
> John E Clifford wrote:
> > (looking ahead) is it meant to make {ku'i} more
> > emphatic: "BUT," not just "however"?
> 
> Yes.
> W: But you were talking by ICQ!

{i ku'i sai} might be better. {sai} modifies the preceding word.
Alternatively, {i ba'e ku'i}. {ba'e} emphasizes the following word.

mu'o mi'e xorxes