From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed May 18 16:36:08 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 May 2005 16:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DYY52-0007mt-M3
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:36:00 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DYY50-0007mb-Ed
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:36:00 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so461494wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gZJ+2eUlXh3OnThGFgAqGNbHCy76Y7T/nAWJKdruNLbA5YcodYNu4ll+E5GG+yn+i7Gy6hw6BTqDpcY1r+Hgi9EMnGLaXft332TdhKCyLqLdZaaLs3OY0F2g800PKRhYDeBeYd/ZziHj7xjp3NTwnRxa49Xo74HqtMK35y4nz4k=
Received: by 10.54.35.68 with SMTP id i68mr688429wri;
        Wed, 18 May 2005 16:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d1756050518163569007309@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:35:26 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: The x1 of fenki
In-Reply-To: <20050518231829.81030.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050518231829.81030.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9966
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/18/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>  But even if
> we could come up with a rationale in this case,
> another case would come along equally mysterious.
>  Languages get words in spite of someone's
> rational scheme, not because of it.

Natlangs, yes. But Lojban did mainly get its words because
of someone's (rational or irrational) scheme.

mu'o mi'e xorxes