From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 19 06:54:04 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 May 2005 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DYlTF-0002p1-Rk
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:53 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DYlTB-0002oZ-P6
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:53 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so743679wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Z8wdT+EYKi72OJIQ5sGdtraKmI8WqRqESp3HMoFyxrW+1C5n7jm2sEPxJjcHCHUcZ1avNUBJKo/J2GIKDWaW3z7ObvAy9teiiArfmCV4QI0Ayax9TF+PwO3h/eUyBf9CXVFI6XbqtwhgU6xquNK76Rh7T4Hxz0s57RUNnWXXUVg=
Received: by 10.54.32.4 with SMTP id f4mr1013868wrf;
        Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605051906532a2240bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:53:18 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: .aunai and .a'unai
In-Reply-To: <20050519133639.73084.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050519133639.73084.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9976
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/19/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> --- Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >So maybe:
> >
> > a'u: willing to acquire (more) information
> > about the subject.
> > a'ucu'i: indifferent to acquiring (more)
> > information about the subject.
> > a'unai: unwilling or unable to acquire (more)
> > information
> > about the subject.
> 
> I am not sure about the "unable;" that would seem
> to imply that {a'u} was for information I could
> get, which seems to me not quite the case: {a'u}
> might well be used as part of a request for
> information I can't get myself, say. 

I meant "unable to acquire more" in the sense of "can't cope with"
rather than "can't obtain by myself". That's what I took Zefram's
TMI to mean.

mu'o mi'e xorxes