From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 03 19:05:15 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DeO27-0002Yc-Ij for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:05:07 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DeO23-0002YH-1a for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:05:07 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so639451wra for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rUfibV/WQ0N5XuITdKEvsG1juUdcR71JuhNbxFjnII/tm2xqc8HCId2foe6KRRke6/QL5XpwLAmH9dOc3ALJ06PzQdIk1vX6YMe/GetxemXdRATFChOs2JaWKYBtlB22KYVBEHAxTrsqODd+ElBHHdN3PaGdMYwoXRwELvNtcHA= Received: by 10.54.26.62 with SMTP id 62mr1599873wrz; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d175605060319053f14f99e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:05:01 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: A word "number of". It shouldn't be that hard. Yeesh. In-Reply-To: <20050604012348.GQ30604@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <1gxfzw1.1vq6qi71spv8amM%kpreid@mac.com> <20050604012348.GQ30604@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10100 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 6/3/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:30:55PM -0400, Kevin Reid wrote: > > What's the appropriate selbri for "x1 is the number of > > members/cardinality of set x2"? > > > > {mei} is obvious, but does not have an ordinary place for the > > number, so can't be used directly for a sumti referring to the > > number. > > > > So far, I see: > > > > lo se zilkancu be sy. > > > > lo se klani be sy. -- what's the x3? > > > > da poi de vei mo'e ke'a ve'o mei sy. ku'o > > I have no idea. I'm just hoping someone else will notice. For precision, {zilkancu}, which can't be confused with anything else. zil-words are ugly, but I suppose we have to get used to them. See . For everyday use, {klani} is probably enough. I use the x3 for the units, which is the useful thing to have rather than for a scale. If you insist on following the gi'uste on that, then {lo se gradu be} will convert from scale to units. So: ta klani li ci lo plise Those are 3 apples. or: ta klani li ci lo se gradu be lo plise Those are three on a scale whose units are apples. mu'o mi'e xorxes