From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jun 13 11:54:46 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dhu4y-0004Ok-Ac for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:36 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dhu4v-0004OT-R8 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:36 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so63644wri for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SYALywlD8WSXv3IgJH6BNCuh2XEEk3YkAGbWH/SF3T0SxkeG1Hw05HGT+iWlmKfjsXypyzgfEqC7vm5Hz+o/2aTupir6pIiMXM1kG45dVQQqC2eEhM92e1yL57zeGeTACh+2kKrLpafSkIShzFI5Ywl/8ApTwFG87bWetiTMNdM= Received: by 10.54.30.40 with SMTP id d40mr2714429wrd; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560506131154393cda2b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:54:32 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Un-definite quantifier. In-Reply-To: <20050613182017.70553.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560506130949b9adcf8@mail.gmail.com> <20050613182017.70553.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10155 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 6/13/05, John E Clifford wrote: > --- Jorge Llambías wrote: > > {lo broda} without quantifiers behaves just as > > {le broda} > > withouth quantifiers, and indeed like any other > > sumti without > > quantifiers. > > If this is true, then the meaning of {le} has > changed even more radically than that of {lo} -- > and now defintely to the dtriment of > expressibility in Lojban. This may actually have > happened since I have seen {le broda} equated > with {lo "broda"}, as though accurate description > were the significant difference. The significant difference is specificity. {le namcu} "the number(s) I have in mind". {le pavyseljirna} "the unicorn(s) I have in mind". {le gerku} "the dog(s) I have in mind". {lo namcu} "number(s)" {lo pavyseljirna} "unicorn(s)" {lo gerku} "dog(s)" The difference doesn't affect how they behave vis-a-vis quantification, which is the same in all cases: PA = PA da poi ke'a me mu'o mi'e xorxes