From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jun 20 09:11:54 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DkOsC-0003S9-2s
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:44 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DkOs9-0003Ry-TK
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:43 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so763197wra
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=lwk392xYIqrH2PgN4yPnxyb+l017jSum54t2busQCs2iZRhXcRfi3pxg1KyQCHIbIhvAJVEal3G+AYImcGqlIGcktnmwi/GNQ1ocVqI65FLzjUwsp0k+j2JMAoW2G0Ys7+xgzKpFkJN3RAPl6TKoLFjOhXloKkQxER3PIkYT3o4=
Received: by 10.54.73.15 with SMTP id v15mr2761321wra;
        Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605062009115da48f60@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:11:38 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban neography
In-Reply-To: <200506201344.j5KDiLTd003997@mole.e-mol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1119217594.8641.7.camel@localhost>
	 <200506201344.j5KDiLTd003997@mole.e-mol.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10221
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 6/20/05, Matt Arnold <mattarn@123.net> wrote:

> 3. Voiced and unvoiced equivalent sounds would be upside-down versions of the same character.

Since a voiced consonant can never appear next to an unvoiced one, you might
try to incorpoarate that into the writing so that it is not possible
to write them
together. That would help people using the alphabet to remember the rule, which
is often forgotten. Vowels and l, m, n, r  would have to be flexible enough to 
accomodate both though. 

You could represent the stress on a vowel by inverting it, though you would
have to change i or the apostrophe.
 
mu'o mi'e xorxes