From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 15 10:03:50 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4iNB-0000Ir-Hw for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:41 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E4iN8-0000Ij-QB for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:41 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1053638wra for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pfmDCRUcEdre21+wXqwFIYSVhZpmEnmJ8hOvh0Rz9IbEUXnq8zj5/uFiTQ7LdIsXCn/tpGvXTGHvqF3ewcSW3iIuzX/M4f0ELYz2TSBlURAgUg2rU7KWeJiqR7xzziYAwhO8rOHd17kBhBR1x30HFxNv83ghFlYhs3JI9wDSAUI= Received: by 10.54.23.8 with SMTP id 8mr3698387wrw; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.68.12 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d175605081510036adc23a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:03:36 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglish: A Modest Proposal In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10365 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 8/15/05, Ben Goertzel wrote: > > As an example of the algorithms I described in my prior mail, suppose > someone says > > "Ben murder chicken pliers quu weapon" > > This means that "Ben murders chickens using pliers as a weapon" > Wouldn't you need: la Ben cu murder lo chicken lo pliers quu weapon ? Otherwise, it might be taken to mean "Ben is a murderous chicken using pliers as a weapon" or "Ben is a murderously chickeny pliers-as-a-weapon" or "Lo! there's Ben type-of murderously chickeny pliers-as-aweapon!" or something else. (I'm not sure if names can be recognized as sumti in Loglish even without {la}, or whether "pliers quu weapon" can be taken as a sumti even without a gadri. You might also need to distinguish "chicken quu animal" from "chicken quu coward".) mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.