From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 15 12:29:33 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E4keC-0002qP-6t
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:29:24 -0700
Received: from web81301.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.76])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E4ke8-0002qC-IZ
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:29:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 26153 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Aug 2005 19:29:19 -0000
Message-ID: <20050815192919.26151.qmail@web81301.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.88.33.134] by web81301.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:29:19 PDT
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglish: A Modest Proposal
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <4300EA30.2020409@online.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-archive-position: 10375
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

-- klaus schmirler <KSchmir@online.de> wrote:

> Jorge Llambías wrote:
> 
> > On 8/15/05, Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> >>As an example of the algorithms I described
> in my prior mail, suppose
> >>someone says
> >>
> >>"Ben murder chicken pliers quu weapon"
> >>
> >>This means that "Ben murders chickens using
> pliers as a weapon"
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Wouldn't you need:
> > 
> >   la Ben cu murder lo chicken lo pliers quu
> weapon
> > 
> > ? Otherwise, it might be taken to mean "Ben
> is a murderous chicken
> > using pliers as a weapon" or "Ben is a
> murderously chickeny 
> > pliers-as-a-weapon" or "Lo! there's Ben
> type-of murderously chickeny 
> > pliers-as-aweapon!" or something else. (I'm
> not sure if names
> > can be recognized as sumti in Loglish even
> without {la}, or whether
> > "pliers quu weapon" can be taken as a sumti
> even without a gadri.  
> > You might also need to distinguish "chicken
> quu animal" from
> > "chicken quu coward".)
> 
> I think the straightforward reading is Ben
> murdering chicken pliers.

Which pliers are some sort of weapon for something.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.