From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Aug 24 10:15:55 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E7yqn-000600-Tl for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:46 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.199]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E7yqi-0005zr-2L for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:45 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v1so97098nzb for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Yye8Hls23UO0hAo5nQA5ywgtb/ohdTkAqGY26S+SkQHniWnEcOMgYBLfAX/lAq0I+BlbO5W8gXJezHuSqxzyjYZ+5o/w64cGcGXUsq5GwxCfVqHRn2PE3/pxG/qq4oYRvUMZp4EThaNDFmfNYMJp9oDOMxha/B9MVtCMmDVfE7I= Received: by 10.36.50.10 with SMTP id x10mr2479349nzx; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.36.8 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f2fd4aa050824101538967457@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:15:38 -0700 From: Brandon Wirick To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V4 #181 In-Reply-To: <12d58c160508240651591fb7df@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <8f2fd4aa05082313582da5d6de@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082314313432fb13@mail.gmail.com> <8f2fd4aa05082316284b2b3763@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160508240651591fb7df@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10435 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: brandon.wirick@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I actually totally considered that, but then I thought that although it would work for my example (and look fairly cool... maybe a little weird), because only .ebu (and optionally .abu) should be emphasized, that technique would not work for .obu, and I intended this to be a prototype. I just kind of made up "le ko menli ba zi makcu" as an arbitrary slogan for an arbitrary product or concept. Maybe someone will come along with something better, and maybe it will contain brivla where .obu needs emphasis. Not that I've certainly come to a better solution, because I can't figure out what kind of accent mark to use above lower case letters in place of capitalization. I'm leaning towards circumflex (as in {lekomênlibazimâkcu}, which I think looks tight), but I can't find any sort of precedent for this matter. mu'o mi'e .uirik. > Consider using a small cap for the 'E'. You could even round the left-side > corners of the character. That way it wouldn't "look" quite so capital & > screw up the design. > > mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan to cnino jbocme toi > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.