From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 26 17:56:56 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8p03-0003ek-09 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:47 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8ozy-0003eX-TQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:46 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so78096wra for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Di6HrcSOFM6sl6Z7+nOdl5yIBbo8w/fdQ2yQjYkFH24JvKJV3Ly8hbTTVgQwi8GDbAy8GpfioEaPUf9Fr1/W1gLS+f/dEiLFFepzUyin6v8lAH+5t+tKAaRLV3TfuRxqmYt/osMh0EXrmsV/pyYVpZT1xSG/1L3nZ4fIDcET6S0= Received: by 10.54.32.62 with SMTP id f62mr1638129wrf; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.7 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050826175641a6689e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:56:41 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: fanva lo nuzba In-Reply-To: <12d58c160508261439c0e62b7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <12d58c160508261114515f9b45@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082612453b577c32@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160508261439c0e62b7@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10455 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER wrote: > On 8/26/05, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER wrote: > > > > > > Maybe: {su'o ci xasycribe cu sepli loi nanmu > > lo mitre ru'e be li 20}? > > That's a clever use of {ru'e}. Would {su'o ci xasycribe cu milxe sepli loi > nanmu lo mitre be li 20} be acceptable? Or maybe {toltce sepli}. vu - mutce sepli - je'a darno - to'e jibni va - milxe sepli - no'e darno - no'e jibni vi - toltce sepli - to'e darno - je'a jibni mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.