From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 27 02:19:33 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8wqI-0002lo-Qk for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:19:15 -0700 Received: from mx18.yandex.ru ([213.180.200.18]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8wqD-0002lQ-5J for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:19:14 -0700 Received: from h116.keldysh.ru ([194.226.57.116]:40081 "EHLO [194.226.57.116]" smtp-auth: "deletesoftware" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S3375725AbVH0JTE convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:19:04 +0400 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at mx18.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: deletesoftware Message-ID: <430F624A.5070009@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:41:14 +0400 From: "Aleksej R. Serdyukov" Organization: Delete Software Limited User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V4 #181 References: <8f2fd4aa05082313582da5d6de@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082314313432fb13@mail.gmail.com> <8f2fd4aa05082316284b2b3763@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160508240651591fb7df@mail.gmail.com> <8f2fd4aa050824101538967457@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082411443d1e75a9@mail.gmail.com> <430E17E4.8070504@yandex.ru> <925d17560508260627655e83df@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560508260627655e83df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 10457 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: deletesoftware@yandex.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Jorge Llambías wrote: >>Though it's not very good with i - í may be very close >>in some fonts... > > I've never had any trouble with it, but maybe I'm biased > since my last name is spelled with an í. :) At least, it's better than "I" which is like "l" sometimes. :) >>î too, ï is nice, but not for that. :-) >>Will {zai basna bu tcita bu} work to mark that? > > In what context? I'd thought that zai . . shows that, since this place, the text will be using the alphabet specified by it? > {zai} converts the following lerfu or tei-foi group into an > alphabet shift, so you'd probably want > {zai tei basna bu tcita bu foi} or {zai basnytcita bu}. The list says "zai" is a 2-word letteral shift. So does jbofi'e think. It's an edited alphabet, isn't it? To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.