From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Sep 03 03:30:22 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EBVHk-0000KU-7X for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:30:08 -0700 Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.206]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EBVHf-0000KE-Ih for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:30:07 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r4.1.) id d.97.66ed35ca (4184) for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2005 06:29:56 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: <97.66ed35ca.304ad524@wmconnect.com> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 06:29:56 EDT Subject: [lojban] lojban logo To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_97.66ed35ca.304ad524_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 52 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 10485 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_97.66ed35ca.304ad524_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/25/2005 4:22:02 AM Central Standard Time, brandon.wirick@gmail.com via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > I have nothing against the current logo, but I'm not sure why Lojban > needs a logo at all. It's a language, and languages don't generally have > logos. I don't see a logo for French or Classical Greek. Lojbanistan is > a fictional country, and, as you point out, needs a flag, not a logo, > though I suppose the current logo or the alternative proposed would do > nicely as a flag. The LLG, as a group of a dozen or so people, doesn't > need a logo. > > robin.tr > I think it's based on the fact that Esperanto has a symbol (not a logo, I think), the green star. stevo --part1_97.66ed35ca.304ad524_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message=20= dated 8/25/2005 4:22:02 AM Central Standard Time, brandon.wirick@gmail.com v= ia ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


I have nothing against the=20= current logo, but I'm not sure why Lojban=20
needs a logo at all. It's a language, and languages don't generally have= =20
logos. I don't see a logo for French or Classical Greek. Lojbanistan is=20
a fictional country, and, as you point out, needs a flag, not a logo,=20
though I suppose the current logo or the alternative proposed would do=20
nicely as a flag. The LLG, as a group of a dozen or so people, doesn't=20
need a logo.

robin.tr


I think it's based on the fact that Esperanto has a symbol (not a logo,=20= I think), the green star.

stevo --part1_97.66ed35ca.304ad524_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.