From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 05 18:06:30 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECRum-0003MN-P8
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:06:20 -0700
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECRuj-0003MA-BC
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:06:20 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v1so750130nzb
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=jDheDIeXgT6l8hIv7C/di50OqPMfwbznXBf93GeTnrJRXMmeMIijBHC8MsfKoS5kl/VYiZ9tie+03YMGLaSJkT/DTOqHxKxY9hZzm4Y4mONCmZJNSrUStZiIE+7hV2pPgtlqK8r5+I0zCk0iAxZIj09j0OqAf3PYkk6YIlLey00=
Received: by 10.36.43.8 with SMTP id q8mr2737458nzq;
        Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.36.8 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8f2fd4aa0509051806100aaaeb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:06:16 -0700
From: Brandon Wirick <brandon@yrick.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: gerzda (ambiguity in lujvo vs. in tanru)
In-Reply-To: <212.85eaf0a.304e43a8@wmconnect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <212.85eaf0a.304e43a8@wmconnect.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10501
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: brandon@yrick.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Yeah, I just read up on that today. Consequently, I had to change some
of the claims I made in my paper. Good thing I realized this now.

On 9/5/05, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> In a message dated 9/5/2005 4:22:28 AM Central Standard Time,
> ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: 
>  
>  
> I was under the impression that lujvo were vague, not ambiguous. A 
> {gerzda} is some sort of nest/house/dwelling with some sort of 
> dog-like aspect to it, right? It is not necessarily a doghouse as 
> English-speakers understand the term. 
>  
> It's tanru that are ambiguous.  Each lujvo takes one specific meaning of a
> tanru and concretizes that single meaning.  The other meanings of the tanru
> require other lujvo (or none at all). 
>  
> stevo


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.