From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 05 20:00:06 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECTgh-0004zr-6B for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:59:55 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ECTgd-0004zd-Hc for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:59:55 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v1so762326nzb for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AZc7nKuc1+y1rFozez9RnwqHU37AtT6f0uPyDKlTyEDSY4U64ydXuL0WLDA1EFLNT7PBTQBXU8W8icz2LbxqGSEgvzhWBSUOUitfCMV4qkt2xkIydmilp4Xv5I41OfVBPcrwxDy0Ov3IsLQoJLsQmmALnD0phZHlpvy1hKHq9N4= Received: by 10.36.138.18 with SMTP id l18mr5265865nzd; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.36.8 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f2fd4aa050905195922e9cca2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:59:49 -0700 From: Brandon Wirick To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Orthography In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050906010833.24545.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com> <8f2fd4aa050905181732abb68a@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10504 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: brandon@yrick.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list It certainly doesn't suck! Good idea on the vowels. Too bad it's impossible to do that with only connected characters. Maybe I can create an applet or something that generates orthographies from a hex string. That way we can all play around with orthographies and communicate along these lines: "Check out this orthography: 4FA39F6..." "Ooh, I like what you did with {ty} and {dy}, but I think it would be better if you did this: 4FA3C96..." I'll get on that soon, or if anyone else is itching to do it, be my guest. mu'omi'e.uirik. On 9/5/05, Matt Arnold wrote: > No doubt this image has other problems, but I tried to visualize a DSO in > which vowels were horizontally symmetrical. Also, in this version I > eliminated the characters made of two unattached vertical lines because > those were a pain to write with. The red characters represent the original > characters which were replaced. Here's the link: > http://www.nemorathwald.com/lojban/lcd_clock_alphabet.gif > Currently I'm drawing a chart of all possible arrangements of segments that > can be in one character. I believe, but am not sure, that they are in binary > code order. After I upload it, I'd like somebody who understands binary to > number them in The Gimp or some such image program so we can use John's > numbering scheme and reference the chart. > -epkat To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.