From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Sep 08 13:07:07 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EDSfi-0008Vq-Ca for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:06:58 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EDSfb-0008Vi-LU for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:06:58 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i25so1078632wra for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K4+0lMRWdGUwTAbXrzU/RQR1RPbPkVGR+T+bdu7GKcwcEUFtW0iFmmvJoh8RGD5j32kWB0JpxPR8aqBvxNM51TWedfw2oQ5qkHAWSFUSJMmvgSdLzRlu4p0dxc96BB5tj1RdCX2ykdw6R7jz734U/4irfQe0wQxJIdgHuEEDubk= Received: by 10.54.52.59 with SMTP id z59mr6369806wrz; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.140.6 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:06:49 -0400 From: Matt Arnold To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Orthography In-Reply-To: <20050908162210.86392.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_28001_1929566.1126210009140" References: <20050908162210.86392.qmail@web81306.mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 10536 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_28001_1929566.1126210009140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline >=20 > Yeah, there is no real need for yet another way > of writing Lojban, even a another way that is > only for Lojban.=20 >=20 My personal reason is that I want to decorate faux-ancient artifacts from a= n=20 extinct advanced civilization with a strange and alien advanced language.= =20 For instance, I intend to have a little translation session at the next=20 Penguicon to entice fans of Stargate into Lojban, in which we decipher a=20 series of glyphs carved in a plaque. -epkat ------=_Part_28001_1929566.1126210009140 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Yeah, there = is no real need for yet another way
of writing Lojban, even a another wa= y that is
only for Lojban. 
My personal reason is that I want to decorate faux-ancient artifacts from an extinct advanced civilization with a strange and alien advanced language. For instance, I intend to have a little translation session at the next Penguicon to entice fans of Stargate into Lojban, in which we decipher a series of glyphs carved in a plaque.
-epkat
------=_Part_28001_1929566.1126210009140-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.