From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 23 09:37:27 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIqY2-0002TU-6N for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:18 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EIqY0-0002TM-3Q for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:18 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so324088nzf for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=njyeBXD7BvdrSkOcP4YYLBev2wXOsCIVOl30BAIH7fqOo7zBxfri27nmBv++YuwyFsxZvkZsW+QLaekjm1iSZxrvS7AOOKRbBv1crGXSFycnkmKJz6uep7y8T9a7nSurMYpc8V1C6uXzr8GmjVaFeiaB/xNN06ycWydTpjiR7qg= Received: by 10.54.16.3 with SMTP id 3mr1028859wrp; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:37:14 -0400 From: Matt Arnold To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Fly, Peacock, Fly In-Reply-To: <925d1756050923091431a58d44@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5281_23512680.1127493434400" References: <925d1756050923091431a58d44@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 10631 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_5281_23512680.1127493434400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/23/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > > mu'i le nu le'i se kecti pinfu > > for the poor prisoners > > I would say {lei} or {le} instead of {le'i}, since mathematical > sets can't really be free or not free. > I thought le'i meant "the set of those described". That may be enough, but if you want to be more literal > maybe something like {cu co'a zifre gau} to indicate that > they are set free and not just that they start to be free. > > ------=_Part_5281_23512680.1127493434400 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/23/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> mu'i le nu le'i se kecti pinfu
> for the poor prisoners

I= would say {lei} or {le} instead of {le'i}, since mathematical
sets can'= t really be free or not free.

I thought le'i meant "the set of those described".

That ma= y be enough, but if you want to be more literal
maybe something like {cu= co'a zifre gau} to indicate that
they are set free and not just that they start to be free.


------=_Part_5281_23512680.1127493434400-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.