From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 26 07:54:16 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EJuMn-0007SL-TA
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:06 -0700
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.204])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EJuMk-0007S3-Qd
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:05 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so130056nzf
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=lNSgzj6H2TSsiPU/Q8EbTYuiFwvowyJdSlHQmHcRk68BajQQZNZuf7FneWZZ2Yb/XmTyVZH/L8v46qFIybetP91mOv2Bz9o0LeogLdNvysIAcG80xYsOpiKKSSKE6sFYYisW7OMR5obghAvzd6zGKC/IXGtSZT3KYYqC8HC9JFE=
Received: by 10.54.112.17 with SMTP id k17mr678462wrc;
        Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560509260754c8ae3df@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:54:01 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Beginning of Esther
In-Reply-To: <4337EFBE.6060102@kli.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200509252342.02776.phma@phma.hn.org> <4337EFBE.6060102@kli.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10640
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 9/26/05, Mark E. Shoulson <mark@kli.org> wrote:
> Pierre Abbat wrote:
>
> >1:4. .i jarco le ka le seltru cu ricfu je carmi .e le ka .abu banli je tsali
> >ze'u lo djedi be li so'i pabino

Is {ze'u} meant to indicate the duration of {banli je tsali}?

> >1:5. .i ca le nu co'u pixsla .abu jajycpe ro zvati be la cucan. prenu noi banli
> >bi'i tolba'i ku'o le purdi be le nolraitru be'o selsruklo tezu'e pixsla ca'o
> >lo djedi be li ze

{.abu} fills the x2 of pixsla here, not the x1 of {jajycpe}.

> >xunro'i joi marmoru joi boijmemai joi xekro'i loldi
> >
>  What's {boijmemai}?  It looks like a fu'ivla,
> but I'm not seeing what it's based on.

It's a cmavo plus a lujvo: {boi jmemai}. Probably
{boljmemai} was meant.


> >1:7. .i punji le selpinxe lo solji kabri .i lo'i vrici kabri cu ficsi'u

That should be {ficysi'u}.

> >1:8. .i flalu le nu pinxe bai noda fu le nolraitru noi minde lei prenu pe le
> >ri zdani lo nu simna lo se djica be ro remna

{nu pinxe kei} or {nunpinxe}.

> {simna}?  Woops.  {sinma}.  It sounds malglico; we don't venerate or
> glorify someone's wishes, we respect them in the sense of obeying them
> or permitting them... I dunno.

{nalpro} maybe? {nalpro ro remna lo se djica}?
There is no gismu for "accept".

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.