From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 27 13:32:31 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM7S-0004t1-Sq
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:07 -0700
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM7R-0004ss-Bl
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:06 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so543598nzf
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=bGIsF5YJ4NZOzL9CyntMEkn/q6mvV4CeG5+M9sOTcp6tn1ZoVa8O+9ES0eVAv6UIJK+E6KAk9zcxE2FYgSJV/PyG4GstXZaFrTk17cdsVKuCWz267GhmkDp5lNHBLiecGD16wDYI1xv6wHgr3yJp3WqihFLxzrsJMtGpQOSaHJY=
Received: by 10.54.52.70 with SMTP id z70mr3060113wrz;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e6663d2005092713326cbf4e02@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:32:04 -0400
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] xorlo podcast
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016"
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-archive-position: 10650
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I would like to run an audio article on the Lojban podcast about xorlo's us=
e
of {lo} and {le}, contrasting them with the old meanings, offering a rundow=
n
of the reasons, and confirming the current status of xorlo's voted-upon
legitimacy or lack thereof. The contrary accounts of this key language
feature is one of the most confusing discrepancies likely to plague
newcomers, and it would be good to have an expert clear it up once and for
all. I would write it, but I myself am vague on the subject. Any takers?
-epkat

------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I would like to run an audio article on the Lojban podcast about
xorlo's use of {lo} and {le}, contrasting them with the old meanings,
offering a rundown of the reasons, and confirming the current status of
xorlo's voted-upon legitimacy or lack thereof. The contrary accounts of
this key language feature is one of the most confusing discrepancies
likely to plague
newcomers, and it would be good to have an expert clear it up once and
for all. I would write it, but I myself am vague on the subject. Any
takers?<br>
-epkat<br>

------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016--


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.