From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 30 13:00:50 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ELR3g-0001eV-A3 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:40 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ELR3a-0001eO-Ra for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:40 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so825wri for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uMc5eAZc1qPik3SbauOA9A6Nzho9NLmW09ST2Sp99dQZQVgDdNQeVvwWxGacpz8AgIY0M7vWSbhjN4DkfMMOzCp8bZRKCrbhh2dO+b6WO6IiR7bOk/XLDl9hEAQxiwww5yUGTyIMYfVLlcwJxFEPqBy1GO6gFeONeUwiPgCEgac= Received: by 10.54.122.11 with SMTP id u11mr982863wrc; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560509301300h1e4f281dtcecb6906d098f4ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:00:33 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: other parsable languages In-Reply-To: <20050930185626.GC1749@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050930183038.GA1749@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050930185626.GC1749@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10689 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 9/30/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Not "so difficult as to be intractable" but "generally believed to > be impossible". > > http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/hobbies/lojban/grammar/index.html > > Look for "Old Approach" at the bottom for an explication. I may be missing something, but there you only say that dealing with terminators in BNF would require a 20-fold expansion of the grammar, which may be difficult but not impossible, not even intractable. What about the PEG grammar, why is that not a complete grammar? Because of ZOI? If so, isn't Lojban minus ZOI (which is really a way of introducing non-Lojban into Lojban) completely parsable? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.