From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 30 18:04:11 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ELVnD-0007HD-Nm for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:03:59 -0700 Received: from mxsrv1.tranzpeer.net ([202.180.66.214]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1ELVmy-0007H2-Rz for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:03:59 -0700 Received: from [203.184.13.194] (helo=gulik.co.nz) by mxsrv1.tranzpeer.net with ESMTP (Exim 4.34) id 1ELVmn-0000AW-DL for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:03:33 +1200 Message-ID: <433DE0C1.1060301@gulik.co.nz> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:05:05 +1200 From: Michael van der Gulik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040216 Debian/1.6.x.1-10 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: adverbs to indicate whose standard is used References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 10698 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mikevdg@gulik.co.nz Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Matt Arnold wrote: > A friend of mine blogged the following: > > "We need a couple of new adverbs (or maybe I just need to find > existing ones) that indicate whose definition of a word we are using: > our's, our subculture's, or society-at-large's. They need to be simple > enough to insert comfortably into casual conversation; single > syllable, and preferably not syllables that could be mistaken for > other adverbs. How about "du'o", based on djuno? > > Why? > > 1. I'd like to be able to say 'I like foo-bad girls' without > stopping to explain that by foo-bad, I mean girls that > society-at-large labels as bad. In this case, because they are > sexually agressive, but that was implied in the conversation. > mi nelci lo ke cinse gunta ke'e bedu'o la se gubni be'o citni'u I like girls that are, by societies' point of view, sexually aggressive. That is a wild guess by a beginner so it's very likely incorrect. I'm not sure if there is also a way to stick pe'i or jinvi in there attached only to that tanru. Does pe'i have an X2 place determining who has that opinion? Michael. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.