From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 30 18:22:53 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ELW5N-0007S8-Jo
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:22:45 -0700
Received: from web81309.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.84])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ELW5K-0007S0-TX
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:22:45 -0700
Received: (qmail 4004 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Oct 2005 01:22:41 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=Y5tgfd6PVPnn0+xctWXduGdyPesNeQBx5+s128BvpgYnQKaN73ODjBbDqM9I1zFY+phIvNEy0w09cuIGGX0V3BPjyPQfHQzDZn0T8j3+iD1TGHUT25kfA8lvnoY/WM4x+GJWuHZ7hbG7XDRjeKFx9N99GNqwSGTnG8YfGDfeuaY=  ;
Message-ID: <20051001012241.4002.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.88.34.50] by web81309.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:22:41 PDT
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: {lo} down/was: RE:xorlo ipodcast
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20050930231450.GO1749@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-archive-position: 10699
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

--- Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:09:37PM -0700, John
> E Clifford wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > --- Jorge Llamb?as <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 9/30/05, Robin Lee Powell
> > > <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > > > If you people really must do this crap in
> public, could you at
> > > > least change the subject line?
> > 
> > As the man in charge in some sense of BPFK,
> it is probably not
> > useful for you to be calling a discussion of
> one of the few items
> > which have actually been worked out "crap."
> 
> Two people using thousands of words arguing
> between themselves on a
> public list when *no-one else* has participated
> is "crap".  The
> subject is irrelevant.

Well, anyone is welcome to participate and I
would have thought that anyone who was concerned
about the language would want to, since the
subject, {lo}, is one of the most pervasive in
the language.  If the level of indifference to
that is so great, I can't help wonder what kind
of future the project has.  But, if the person in
chanrge thinks that {lo} is irrelevant, I suppose
the future is not very promising altogether
anyhow.
  
> Note, however, that in my lexicon "crap" is
> barely even an insult.
> More of a generic identifier with a mild
> implication of distaste.

Sorry, I took it as stronger.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.