From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 28 11:39:54 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EVZ8e-00028M-D0
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:40 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EVZ8b-00028F-HZ
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:40 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so258136wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=P7Y73Jg1nJNnUe2lwRtlcg3Z2S09wNcweCEysQ62nkz9VTUL0HsBtE6t2mrKNBTmMNKnm16i5Z1w9Clgc7tOnMhNgn2tJae/jQKr6TrvWB0WezaVrxRtXFv+d2qpHTso3P7v12h4Q+d8UNFh0goaktmLjN5zRVuOSdpGy38VuuA=
Received: by 10.54.115.3 with SMTP id n3mr305484wrc;
        Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560510281139g37adf21cta7dabb247fb1ba61@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:39:36 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: citri lo glibau
In-Reply-To: <12d58c160510280915x764d9b8du4ba3f9a68d9742e1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <12d58c160510280915x764d9b8du4ba3f9a68d9742e1@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10733
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 10/28/05, Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com> wrote:

> pi so'i lo selbau cu ke se sadgunta je tolselctu ke'e natmrkamri
> tercange

ke-ke'e is redundant here because the grouping it provides is
the default grouping:

( (ke se sadgunta je tolselctu ke'e) natmrkamri ) tercange

Perhaps you meant:

 (se sadgunta je tolselctu) (ke natmrkamri tercange [ke'e])

which would sound more like in English. It is not very clear to
me though why any grouping is necessary, since at least
in a naive logical view the meaning is:

 se sadgunta je tolsectu je natmrkamri je tercange

One wouldn't say it like that in English, but I can't quite
put my finger on why not.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.