From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 28 14:13:18 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EVbX9-0005m2-8U for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:07 -0700 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EVbX7-0005lm-3h for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:07 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h29so520422wxd for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=XKqg22p8mul2h52W0Wuzfs6Ieo87N/WvrQTxxc0BiGp8T0OJtYjbDmEGe0OKRIOX5EmgL5/kk2z8ZyTtNFjRSqyDlfh2jJcAQoxCZ1oBMMWaABKPTkL7ICsrKoheorc9RfbKyBGfoY6ps6fbQ5t7A6jRwzGsShCmpZbI+4Mw/Fg= Received: by 10.70.124.13 with SMTP id w13mr530669wxc; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.10 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <12d58c160510281413v2a158464maecf719283548606@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:13:04 -0400 From: Adam COOPER To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: citri lo glibau In-Reply-To: <925d17560510281207g5c66eb65jc524dc783c7b8bd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7075_11932692.1130533984172" References: <12d58c160510280915x764d9b8du4ba3f9a68d9742e1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560510281207g5c66eb65jc524dc783c7b8bd@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 10742 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_7075_11932692.1130533984172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 10/28/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > I don't think {o,a} or {e,o} fit with Lojban > phonotactics. They won't be allowed if my proposed > phonology becomes official. A possible form for those > names would be {komfo'amonan} and {bE'ouulf}. Your proposal would pretty much make the comma obsolete, then, right? Oy. m= i na djica lo nu za'u re'u finti lo jbocme be vo'a kei vau zo'o .i zo'o nai pe'i mi jimpe lo se stidi be do I also dislike irregular stress, so I would choose {beuulf} > or {be'ouulf} instead of {bE'ouulf}, but this is an even more > personal preference). Do you dislike it in Spanish as well? mu'o mi'e ky ------=_Part_7075_11932692.1130533984172 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 10/28/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think {o,a} or {e,o} fit with Lojban
phonotactics. They won't be= allowed if my proposed
phonology becomes official. A possible form for = those
names would be {komfo'amonan} and {bE'ouulf}.

Your proposal would pretty much make the comma obsolete, then, right? Oy. mi na djica lo nu za'u re'u finti lo jbocme be vo'a kei vau zo'o .i zo'o nai pe'i mi jimpe lo se stidi be do 

I also dislike irregular stress, s= o I would choose {beuulf}
or {be'ouulf} instead of {bE'ouulf}, but this is an even more
person= al preference).

Do you dislike it in Spanish as well?

mu'o mi'e ky
------=_Part_7075_11932692.1130533984172-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.