From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 28 14:29:27 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EVbmn-00065Z-0c
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:17 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EVbmj-00065P-UO
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:16 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so267490wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=oDut0lJf1Q80wgLEO8h5C2o3pE6basA/mDjsS2upBAPMf5n8GSZ9pi+FIYPu4ak6CsZcclmTkktO9MClzOwW5y+/MZxwP5eq+jlPdRHYeeJll1qfPqcwlifOJzn0uLc29qxb8KowCLMDyqrheKoRUtJsuCBzJa/uOtXBggQ6Mvs=
Received: by 10.54.115.3 with SMTP id n3mr330778wrc;
        Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560510281429l33f2435er16a241f5a83f88d0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:29:11 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: citri lo glibau
In-Reply-To: <12d58c160510281413v2a158464maecf719283548606@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <12d58c160510280915x764d9b8du4ba3f9a68d9742e1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560510281207g5c66eb65jc524dc783c7b8bd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <12d58c160510281413v2a158464maecf719283548606@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10743
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 10/28/05, Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/28/05, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think {o,a} or {e,o} fit with Lojban
> > phonotactics. They won't be allowed if my proposed
> > phonology becomes official. A possible form for those
> > names would be {komfo'amonan} and {bE'ouulf}.
>
> Your proposal would pretty much make the comma obsolete, then, right?

Yes. The comma is already optional though. No two words can differ
by a comma. The comma can at most indicate a preferred
pronounciation, but a word with or without the comma is
the same word. At least that's the official rule. This causes
some problems though: Is {stra,i} a valid fu'ivla, for instance?

> Oy. mi
> na djica lo nu za'u re'u finti lo jbocme be vo'a kei vau zo'o .i zo'o nai
> pe'i mi jimpe lo se stidi be do

What's the source/meaning of komfo,amonan?

> > I also dislike irregular stress, so I would choose {beuulf}
> > or {be'ouulf} instead of {bE'ouulf}, but this is an even more
> > personal preference).
>
> Do you dislike it in Spanish as well?

No, but one of the attractions of Lojban is its regularity. In this
case the dislike is more ideological than anything else though.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.