From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 16 12:34:17 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EcTyr-00066S-Dh
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:09 -0800
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.195])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EcTyo-00066D-PC
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:09 -0800
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s19so1729804wxc
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:04 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=eNFM7Wcl+oq0KNsnGX8xYf6NlRUfLReFiCYpoXUyboTGHKSzKKCkTBzLBIJLYOp+TD0e+k/qPbj8te/nPY/M5D35axFea8r7OVS8deHZyvRoeDyKcOHsT/2f5Y00V1ko40/OkemyAyttucP81Q3Rr1R+cekzq0+AXrU1Xaq5q7E=
Received: by 10.65.183.3 with SMTP id k3mr1554719qbp;
        Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.40.15 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <55b258c20511161234p85ae8bcm1c2162211f310bca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:34:03 -0600
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: A ranking system for Lojban speaking proficiency?
In-Reply-To: <20051116202637.GC20158@miranda.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <55b258c20511161151q31ec15ci56dcd2ed1ff15987@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051116202637.GC20158@miranda.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 10787
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

> > And should spectators be allowed to vote? (Maybe you can let them
> > vote and then somehow weight the results based on what percentage of
> > people voted which way, so you can have win, kinda-win, draw,
> > kinda-loss, loss.)
>
> The underlying math I implemented would be ok with that, but I think
> it would probably produce better results to simply have the results
> of more conversations recoded. (The spectators should go have their
> own conversations. :)

If the spectators are participants in other two-way conversations
within the same multi-way conversation, though, they *are* having
their own conversations.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.