From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 15 11:45:48 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Emz2h-0004ms-Mb for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:31 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Emz2f-0004mk-IP for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:31 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so432528wri for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gHSQk0rcOFoS8qq7mJAYlKp/KNNOR0wduuwPehur1fLpY/vMmPwPFcmbd5+AMCpGdHr69/UMQjqVgOJpUmYUYIPhoUr/ioS7IGNrCUtF/X4AlYhL+hxkCF7bHFDXFD8ccCUedfa1pg81mP128F0JfP92dS3SE9t9FsTvQrCRZVM= Received: by 10.54.114.13 with SMTP id m13mr2700036wrc; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.126.1 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:45:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560512151145h38ac9313jf199d67d61e0e047@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:45:22 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: A Proposed Explanation of {gunma} In-Reply-To: <20051215181005.77143.qmail@web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560512150739yf804ea6r3ff724df2d5020e8@mail.gmail.com> <20051215181005.77143.qmail@web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 10900 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 12/15/05, John E Clifford wrote: > It should be noted -- pragmatically again -- that > in contexts where the distributivity/collectivity > is at issue, {lo} becomes the marker for > distributivity just by not being {loi}. Not any more that it becomes the marker for non-distributivity just by not being {ro}. In contexts where distributivity is at issue, {lo} can go either way, and if context is not sufficient to disambiguate, the speaker has simply failed to provide enough information. > On the other hand, the gadri > and quantifier methods of indicating predication > are technically inadequate since they do not say > what kind of predication is involved in the > description itself: "Those who (together) > surround the building are red-haired" might need > to be distinguished from "Those who (each) > surround the bulding are very long walls" for > example. Right, when you need such precision, the price is more wordiness. For example: ro da poi lu'o ke'a sruri le dinju cu xunre kerfa ro sruri be le dinju cu clani bitmu {lo ro sruri be le dinju cu xunre kerfa} is perfectly understandable, but does not include any distribution information explicitly. > The gadri indiciation also complicates > collapsing cases of two kinds of predication with > a common core: "The wall (by itself) and the > students (together) surround the bulding" That one is not hard: le bitmu .e loi tadni cu sruri le dinju {.e} is distributive, and {loi} is not. > and as > above "John and Mary (separately) picked up tools > and (together) started to build a house." Right, this one requires splitting into two sentences. > {pagbu} will not always work for "part" if > transitivity is maintained, since I am a part of > society and my liver is a part of me, but my > liver is not a part of society. I suspect that might be because of the ambiguity of "I/me", in one case referring to my person and in the other to my body: My person is part of society and my liver is part of my body, but I would not say that my body is part of society or that my liver is part of my person. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.