From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 16 05:37:41 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EnFly-0005nL-DV for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:22 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EnFlw-0005nD-60 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:22 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so583505wri for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fS6VoHW6BFqVxPN2ucLoLtPgAuMrWJyg0ch221XxsAMie83YLpyiJ1UDN7I877NIVnvmYUB/MZx3Aft3Tx8Zfq84eQf0RVrXi/CXMqybMNYvHLL05GexYhAop7JLtzpHqnRwSkUX4l/Ne05n7IUuIMjgpiKTgs29hBe/NukWQJY= Received: by 10.54.67.6 with SMTP id p6mr3683500wra; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.126.1 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:37:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560512160537t16367b82n387bf785628cc829@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:37:18 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: A Proposed Explanation of {gunma} In-Reply-To: <20051216023103.95750.qmail@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560512151725l7f5ff303laa1821bc78a516a8@mail.gmail.com> <20051216023103.95750.qmail@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 10910 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 12/15/05, John E Clifford wrote: > After (probably immediately) first arguments, > immediately before others but also in compound > predicates at the appropriate places around the > predicate (hard to state clearly which probably > means it still has bugs in it). Yes it does. You would basically have the same situation as now, except that you would put the mark at the back of the sumti instead of at the front. Consider a simple example: ko'a ko'e ko'i broda gi'e brode vau fo'a fo'e fo'i Suppose you want to mark broda as distributive for ko'e and non-distributive for fo'e, and brode as non-distributive for ko'e and distributive for fo'e. Where do the marks go? One solution would be to have the marks on the selbri, with an indication of which place it applies to, either a subindex or a different word for each place. Alternatively, you can mark it on the sumti with an indication of which selbri it corresponds to. Either way is cumbersome. > I suspect that any solution is going > to have some problems but overall the UIish one > seems simplest and is more uniform (and has fewer > odd ontological suggestions). Ulish? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.