From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 09 04:33:34 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:33:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EvwCf-0005gc-Eg for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:32:50 -0800 Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EvwCR-0005gU-Ed for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:32:42 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id d.14.53b4e190 (48600) for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:32:27 -0500 (EST) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: <14.53b4e190.30f3b1db@wmconnect.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:32:27 EST Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V5 #7 To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_14.53b4e190.30f3b1db_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 52 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-archive-position: 11018 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_14.53b4e190.30f3b1db_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/9/2006 4:22:02 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > On 1/7/06, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > In more common names, the English names "John", "Jan", "Jane", and "Jen" > > are so packed that Lojbanization loses distinctness. > > I would do them as {djon}, {djan}, {djein} and {djen}, but "John" has > been traditionally lojbanized as {djan}. (There's also {djin} and {djun} > for "Gene" and "June".) > and "Joan"? {djon}. "Jan" and "Jen" are probably the two hardest to differentiate. stevo --part1_14.53b4e190.30f3b1db_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message=20= dated 1/9/2006 4:22:02 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org=20= writes:


On 1/7/06, Bob LeChevalier=20= <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> In more common names, the English names "John", "Jan", "Jane", and=20= "Jen"
> are so packed that Lojbanization loses distinctness.

I would do them as {djon}, {djan}, {djein} and {djen}, but "John" has
been traditionally lojbanized as {djan}. (There's also {djin} and {djun}
for "Gene" and "June".)


and "Joan"?  {djon}.  "Jan" and "Jen" are probably the two har= dest to differentiate.

stevo --part1_14.53b4e190.30f3b1db_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.