From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Feb 01 05:04:41 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F4HeQ-00028X-QI for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:04:01 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F4He7-00027v-1Q for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:03:54 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so140539wri for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:03:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=X8el0UBDBbwAjFOdUDI3kvJ802ckcBrlvaqYte6TERlZ9YiubwK3R5lFAZU7d1cHMButGMW7ugQJdYfEtszjiggOnN561GtLyCWupB1lIk/8nnC4mi3e1erZEdp7FKlMWCbvXjtnYC5syKp3nm2IzDszKCGVzYxjj4XzR+hl0xk= Received: by 10.54.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr10883721wre; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:03:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.126.19 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 05:03:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560602010503t572934fcy8205e38c71937c35@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:03:35 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Why is this ungrammatical? In-Reply-To: <1967364471.20060201184843@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <777938058.20060201155929@mail.ru> <925d17560602010425s2890d279p683a3c13cf3a3440@mail.gmail.com> <1967364471.20060201184843@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11102 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 2/1/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > Oh, I see... We can also add {ku} like this: > > roda rode zo'u lonu da gasnu lonu de morsi kei kei ku du lonu da catra de Yes. But I think {cu} is always more economical, and always easier for the listener to parse, than any terminator. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.