From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Feb 22 20:03:37 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FC7hH-00043f-8y for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:19 -0800 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FC7hF-00043X-5N for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:18 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a27so1056977nfc for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FYlGLhoImYD2NJkHyheSsa2mCzBP11ozoBF9IWn5DAxIGR0XoBzFGgrTRbJb9KRHM/d/wVZzbUnxHtfLJ6PjkeTROxYccxUL0SdUNQGv/JCqRnbOOrpZ0sDlY0FAyo8O2g3yb/MHLsn2YcrhhXEu9/lU2Ho9w1MlodxC8Bx3Bow= Received: by 10.48.203.19 with SMTP id a19mr2197734nfg; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.215.17 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:14 -0800 From: Betsemes To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: caxmati In-Reply-To: <925d17560602220447r50c11f94nc16947f944092604@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <1908852392.20060220122317@mail.ru> <925d17560602201332vec5e958r5fc0ed4ace8c1ab@mail.gmail.com> <200602220546.54097.phma@phma.optus.nu> <925d17560602220447r50c11f94nc16947f944092604@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11130 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >Probably, but then cmevla should have the full grammar of brivla, so you can say "chess board" or "chess piece" with simple tanru. {lo tanbo pe la caxmat}? {lo spisa pe la caxmat}? not sure about that use of {spisa} On 2/22/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 2/22/06, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Monday 20 February 2006 18:32, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > > I think I'd rather have a word for chess than for "a game of chess" > though. > > > > A word for "chess" should IMHO be a cmevla, such as {caxmat}. > > Probably, but then cmevla should have the full grammar of brivla, > so you can say "chess board" or "chess piece" with simple tanru. > > > We can have both of course. > > Yes. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.