From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 14 07:05:08 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FUOuU-0004qD-RK for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:04:34 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.237]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FUOuK-0004q2-44 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:04:27 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i34so43427wra for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:04:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AxrIFO6T+ugPl//UbrAkt18DU3nPogYHK3oec0b3itzOeFmgSReu4S+rdYiFZgYtXeC8s67BCASndJE+9jqqY4RtOxHHq8L89omvsAXypmaDhzRTaizCJp6NuWQJ9Ep/jjug9T+Szrl0OKVmNmO7m9KBJIv1PsDAmXcsiQBjals= Received: by 10.54.93.7 with SMTP id q7mr437707wrb; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:04:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.19 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:04:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560604140704n56846fbet4c92567d0c9bc800@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:04:19 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "Negation" of relative clauses In-Reply-To: <1797760549.20060414133306@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <1797760549.20060414133306@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11334 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 4/14/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > > Can {pe do} be negated, like in English > "I like all cars that are not of you.", or > "I like all [not-your] cars." The natural way to do it would be with {pe nai do}, but that is not grammatical at the moment. I have proposed that {nai} be moved to selma'o CAI so that it can be used after any word. Now you can say {pe sai do} or {pe ru'e do} but not {pe nai do}. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.