From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 04 17:45:50 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 May 2006 17:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FboRo-0004H7-0G for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 17:45:32 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FboRl-0004Gy-IZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 17:45:31 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i34so466205wra for ; Thu, 04 May 2006 17:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kS9cg7OCzLkz8vo7NvhubYBWkKTB4HyyUwRW0kmOGhkhq6aKWWPB/55j8SZVpbOI2075aMgGhn3krpn9qJrY1oODC94/6M0knWQhQvNCsvBDq7kOiWHqcf86qrEdYDYyf15TT6a6/QGvRfjoHAQLhVJKwiL1mUb3SwaOWRRKsVY= Received: by 10.65.235.17 with SMTP id m17mr210910qbr; Thu, 04 May 2006 17:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.218.2 with HTTP; Thu, 4 May 2006 17:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:45:27 -0600 From: "Maxim Katcharov" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Usage of lo and le In-Reply-To: <925d17560605041643p201da7e1rdc57bb7f1339e9ed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560605031836w12547ba3n87934504df64c309@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560605040604s4366e278h5385c63dc7c0aacc@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560605041643p201da7e1rdc57bb7f1339e9ed@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11380 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: maxim.katcharov@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5/4/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 5/4/06, Maxim Katcharov wrote: > > What does it mean to have the > > bear "in mind"? Is it opposed to, say, "any bear", or "bears in > > general", or "bearness", or "all bears typically"? > > Yes. (Except for "bearness", because lo cribe has to be something > that does cribe, and bearness doesn't.) [...] > > I would like to have what "in mind" means explained. > > I think {le} indeed serves to preclude the "any" or "in general" > interpretation that {lo} does not preclude. So... is it then impossible to use {lo'e} in conjunction with "le"? If it is possible, then what do you mean by {le} serving to preclude the "any" or "in general" interpretations? To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.