From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 11 07:37:48 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeCIB-0002wO-CJ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:28 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.227]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeCI6-0002wD-UX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:26 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so149943wra for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bJ/ADHJFVKdL5WO5rNulwfGzNSuxVHXTqVUBRBXiQU4lpiXJkUvQshxqGjNtkj+NEPb3tswyu5w22WYcrMhckD6dyj30A/VikCvK8uAqOVba7+nbiz3lIKaNRAjf9hxLQ2gMsBTDQsUSZTMFzuURxvEpMVAGFc2sW8tDIz73kmM= Received: by 10.64.220.11 with SMTP id s11mr486726qbg; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.249.4 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:37:20 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Intention In-Reply-To: <4462E8B4.1060806@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <1647568247.20060511134429@mail.ru> <4462E8B4.1060806@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 11490 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5/11/06, Paul Vigo wrote: > Yanis Batura wrote: > > > coi ro do la lojban. banli > > > > > > What is the best guess for this selbri: > > > > > > x1 intends/ has intention to [do] x2 (event/state) > > > > > > {djica} or {zukte} don't fit: > > > > {djica} is preceding the intention, while {zukte} is succeeding it. > > > > > > mi'e .ianis. > > > Does prupla work for your purposes? > purci+platu > ie has planned, intends to > > if you intend something you have "decided" to do it so the past tense > works (as long as it doesn't exclude the present). > > mi'e .pav. > {platu} is pretty close. I wouldn't add the element of {pruci}. At best, it would be superfluous. At worst, it might mean that the person used to intend but is not intending any more. I'd just use {platu} or {jdice}. -epkat To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.