From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 16 12:55:50 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fg5dh-0007FU-Pg for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:29 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fg5dg-0007FM-7y for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:29 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so51700wri for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rXpBCQuHHhdPWetjeXv7xSn4f94mXbst1vLu0/NutkZiEB5H98jB1voWJXd9jrAwwRseT/PlIqoQj5+mtclMNIfoA4itb08Yof+jFNVYug9YFzUczgp+lxc+7uyZvu1BRURf+8b1rbGWK0dVE9JSG4HGb8Ymb/xMe5u7DUm457o= Received: by 10.54.146.17 with SMTP id t17mr1442103wrd; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.126.17 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560605161255qed5f1aeu4918d7b322f35bd0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:55:26 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: X-bar, chomsky and lojban In-Reply-To: <446A29E5.2020409@v21.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <57995.192.94.94.105.1147732061.squirrel@www.thebranchhearth.net> <446A29E5.2020409@v21.me.uk> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11570 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5/16/06, And Rosta wrote: > > If you mean X-bar theory in its most generic sense (= headed phrases) then > IMO the answer is: Basically yes, but iff elided terminators are syntactically > present even though unpronounced. (The terminator would be head of the > phrase it terminates.) Is there any reason to prefer the terminator to the "initiator" of the phrase as head? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.