From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 09 15:57:54 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fopv6-0001Kt-0k for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:57:36 -0700 Received: from mxsf35.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.160]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fopv3-0001Km-1b for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:57:35 -0700 Received: from mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.187]) by mxsf35.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k59MvUVb021469 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:57:31 -0400 Received: from 24-247-28-251.dhcp.bycy.mi.charter.com (HELO [192.168.123.137]) ([24.247.28.251]) by mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2006 18:57:30 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,225,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="1237235383:sNHT33745756" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <925d17560606090813o32d608e3pa4fef3f3190c0c4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <925d17560606071637u1dfabac7n6e3551086a616f58@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606080643r55da8773gd4fad0bdac0c505a@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606080832j516fc7c9g7783a394f3d1074a@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606090549k2275f466x7802ac6c9b6abfd3@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606090813o32d608e3pa4fef3f3190c0c4c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis From: Alex Martini Subject: [lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all} Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:57:29 -0400 To: lojban-list@lojban.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11774 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: alexjm@umich.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Jun 9, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 6/9/06, Maxim Katcharov wrote: >> For >> example, I think that the following is grammatical under your rules, >> but I find the interpretation infeasible (or awkward), since it uses >> both "markers": >> >> lu'o ro lo tadni cu sruri lo dinju > > For me that's equivalent to {lu'o lo ro lo tadni} and it marks the > slot > that the sumti fills as non-distributive. It is only the outermost > marker > that concerns the distributivity of the slot. > Could someone explain the use of {lo} twice here? I've never seen such a thing before, and would have expected it to be ungrammatical. ki'e mu'o mi'e .aleks. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.