From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 09 17:06:47 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Foqzj-0002YA-RI for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:06:29 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.235]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Foqzh-0002Y0-Df for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:06:27 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i5so961129wra for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:06:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PsKydLpZr83Olcw/R0cVr5VAlx47isPqkHYKoxx58OBcT3eSJOgAokacqCSNwVP2XnxcF7rjcRPlYr5hZyZfy2LeWFBiSt1lbZXK97L4whueuFxt99VeQlA7/ytDoBpfhIyVJhfT6t8NQWy20h0M2XTSc00Cc8JZWPQct8NRxB8= Received: by 10.64.76.8 with SMTP id y8mr3417239qba; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.237.19 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560606091706h5bb28cb3j3a870d3ddbc693ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:06:22 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all} In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560606080643r55da8773gd4fad0bdac0c505a@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606080832j516fc7c9g7783a394f3d1074a@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606090549k2275f466x7802ac6c9b6abfd3@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560606090813o32d608e3pa4fef3f3190c0c4c@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11775 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 6/9/06, Alex Martini wrote: > > Could someone explain the use of {lo} twice here? I've never seen > such a thing > before, and would have expected it to be ungrammatical. Multiple gadri make more sense with specific {le} than with {lo}. For example: so mlatu cu nenri le zdani "There are nine cats inside the house." mi viska mu le so mlatu "I saw five of the nine cats." ci le mu le so mlatu cu blabi "Three of the five of the nine cats were white." And it can be done indefinitely. It's not really very useful, but it's grammatical. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.