From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 27 18:21:05 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvOjW-0006NT-Lz for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:20:46 -0700 Received: from web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.128]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvOjU-0006NM-2w for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:20:46 -0700 Received: (qmail 9507 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jun 2006 01:20:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4lwzWb/UP4hq5VsVAXAVA94Bayf7GaehEZDRVT1eXDHb1X1Gmwgb7FPei3SX7A/4PmUEgNoLSYWskdf+Y2hxWoXzcDdu+PAj+yoCMUX/FN/XyJulFo7dpASrpBEP5aBTx7A04MoUZZnEsmc71JyX2zICQcZkRGuTeFy3jkDCg1A= ; Message-ID: <20060628012040.9505.qmail@web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.237.199.54] by web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:20:40 PDT Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:20:40 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: [lojban] Re: flashcards? To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <44A1CB76.1010406@bilkent.edu.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-archive-position: 11842 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Good one! (even allowing for polysyllabic words) --- robin wrote: > Chris Capel wrote: > > On 6/26/06, Alex Martini wrote: > >> On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:41 AM, Paul Vigo wrote: > >> > With > >> > lojban I think this may be particularly useful as many of the gismu > >> > are complex (place structure variations can make a familiar seeming > >> > word suddenly novel again) and many look pretty much the same > >> > (cvccv / ccvcv) so are easy to confuse with other gismu when > >> > unfamiliar. > >> > >> On the topic of gismu looking simmilar, how much work would be > >> involved in making a list of gismu that only differ by vowels? I've > >> found a few pairs like {ciska} and {cusku} that I repeatedly have to > >> look up to keep apart, but I'm not sure how many there are total. > > > > Are there any natlangs that pack words more tightly into phonetic > > space than Lojban? > > > Chinese? > > robin.tr > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.5/376 - Release Date: 26/06/2006 > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.