From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jul 08 08:53:59 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzF7l-000363-0A for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:53:41 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzF7k-00035v-6d for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:53:40 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so871970pyi for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:53:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UrkBxBSvBd9NCpieJMazj31slkxcNFEZ41NoYM5G+8FnHtNMCsawFrDfLl+VzKXVkwqS3rvRb36iRixMsUENx9tUR/IeAZzuiGsTUcc6Ip/TvYIhTDAx5dv0EiAfkQvhV3UwQ1GbcQWGQyog+nuXZLRM+zEeuNidsxWPPEZfkFU= Received: by 10.35.20.14 with SMTP id x14mr3267179pyi; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.14.17 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560607080853p5ad59ba1y406851d2251bff20@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:53:38 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Anecdote #8] prami jbixa'u In-Reply-To: <191514D4-2824-4E82-92E5-80DB8D27E463@umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <471248372.20060708213525@mail.ru> <191514D4-2824-4E82-92E5-80DB8D27E463@umich.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 11983 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 7/8/06, Alex Martini wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Yanis Batura wrote: > > > [ li'o ] .i le jbixa'u cu cinba le fetspe be vo'a ca ro nu vo'a > > xruti le zdani > > Should this be {le fetspe pe vo'a}? Jbovlaste gives the x2 as > 'speni3', which is law/custom/tradition/system/convention. Nah, that's clearly a bad definition. There doesn't seem to be any reason to drop the x2 of {speni} in {fetspe}. If one did drop it, it would seem that the meaning of the lujvo would have to be {speni be lo fetsi} instead of {fetsi je speni}. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.