From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jul 09 10:37:06 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzdD5-0003IY-Fi for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:36:47 -0700 Received: from web81310.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.126]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzdD4-0003IP-Hq for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:36:47 -0700 Received: (qmail 55252 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jul 2006 17:36:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kp1280Zh8YO6Ba+KWxVbtaXUy4G/C14SA7ZTSFYb5OdxJDSwQF/dzlMZHylhSfXDmO2284A4E6Qy9Pk6s5zpDFwAk81N/+/H6KtvkLtnaql8iFth0d5SWORNsf+SvaqqijflY1fWp0+AadP0Px9quTZ+oKAP6UYBExYfgpg5nxo= ; Message-ID: <20060709173645.55250.qmail@web81310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.237.228.212] by web81310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:36:45 PDT Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:36:45 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: [lojban] Re: ZOI and culture neutrality To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <44B09643.5010005@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-archive-position: 12024 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Sorry, I took you as saying it ought to be done (what improvements usually entail). this was a request -- in that light -- to show where the need lay, i.e., in what sense its inclusion would be an improvement on something. --- Hugh O'Byrne wrote: > John E Clifford wrote: > > ... I don't see the need for it. > > In the argument (summarized) > > me: I think something could be improved! > you: I don't see the need for it. > > your point is at best value-neutral (not even value-negative). I would > ask you not to filibuster. > > -- > Good night, and have a rational tomorrow! > > mi'e .xius. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.