From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jul 10 03:24:24 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fzsvc-0006pT-NJ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:23:49 -0700 Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzsvK-0006pI-Qg for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:23:45 -0700 Received: by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix, from userid 72) id AFACD32292; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:23:28 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [139.179.97.195] (unknown [139.179.97.195]) by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8E73218E for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:23:28 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <44B21C12.5060806@bilkent.edu.tr> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:21:22 +0300 From: robin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.6.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one. References: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com> <925d17560607061651p19623e56x7c188368533f9c48@mail.gmail.com> <20060706235433.GJ18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <2d3df92a0607081047i5ba3e2b5ucf79eaf3bed81d4a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0607081047i5ba3e2b5ucf79eaf3bed81d4a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 12057 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list HeliodoR wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote > > > will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't > > > really see the point of having an official alphabet. > > > > That would be my inclination as well. > > And mine. I tend to think that the "Usage will determine" plays into > this well. > > > i'e > I share this opinion too. .i'e I also think that in terms of cultural neutrality, "Use whichever alphabet you want" is about as neutral as you can get! robin.tr To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.